.co.it domains list

What is .co.it TLD

“.co.it” is not a standalone top-level domain. It is a second‑level name under Italy’s .it country-code, used to create third‑level labels (for example, example.co.it). Practically, .co.it domains are subdomain delegations beneath the privately registered co.it zone rather than an ICANN/IANA TLD. .co.it websites behave like any other hostnames: they resolve via standard DNS and can carry TLS, email, and security controls. In context, some countries formalized commercial SLDs (e.g., .co.uk); Italy mostly favors direct second‑level .it registrations, so .co.it usage is niche and provider‑dependent. We analyze DNS, zone snapshots, and active scans to profile operators, uptime, and configuration hygiene across this space. Explore .co.it domain datasets from webatla for evidence-led decisions.

History and key features of .co.it TLD

Historically, “.co.*” structures emerged to signal commercial activity, but .co.it never became an official, registry-managed category; it remains an ordinary second‑level domain whose holder may delegate third‑level names. Consequently, policies for .co.it domains—availability, pricing, transfers, and SLAs—depend on the co.it operator, not on Registro .it. Key features include third‑level addressing, single‑point dependency on the co.it holder, and familiar DNSSEC/TLS support. For .co.it websites, implications include portability constraints versus native .it names and potential perception differences among users and search engines treating them as subdomains. Using longitudinal crawl data, we examine adoption bursts, defensive registrations, and configuration patterns such as MX, AAAA, and DMARC alignment. Inspect historical .co.it domain datasets from webatla with interactive intelligence.

Why and who choose the .co.it domain

Organizations choose .co.it domains for varied reasons: memorable short labels, reseller bundles, or consistent naming across projects linked to Italy. Typical adopters include subdomain resellers, SMBs seeking alternatives when desired .it strings are taken, marketers launching campaign microsites, and operators building URL shorteners or internal tools. For .co.it websites, advantages are quick provisioning and cohesive branding; trade‑offs include reliance on a single second‑level owner, unclear portability, and recognition that some audiences prefer native .it or .com. We assess risks via DNS responsiveness, certificate issuance, and email authentication footprints, offering comparative baselines versus standard .it hosts. Evaluate opportunities using .co.it domain datasets from webatla today.