.sucks domains list

What is .sucks TLD

The .sucks top‑level domain is a generic namespace designed for commentary, criticism, and stakeholder feedback on organizations, products, and public issues. It operates like other gTLDs under ICANN rules, with registrations open to individuals and entities worldwide. In practice, .sucks domains host consumer forums, redirects to corporate feedback pages, and brand-protection holdings that never resolve. We analyze .sucks websites to understand how registrants leverage the extension for discourse and reputation management, including patterns in DNS configuration, certificate deployment, and redirect behavior. Our indexing shows clustering around review content and campaign microsites, with measurable defensive portfolios among larger brands. This definition and context help set expectations about purpose and typical use. Explore webatla’s .sucks domain datasets for unbiased visibility.

History and key features of .sucks TLD

Introduced during ICANN’s new‑gTLD expansion in the mid‑2010s, the .sucks TLD followed standard rights‑protection phases and moved to general availability with open eligibility. Key features are straightforward: compatibility with DNSSEC, acceptance by major certificate authorities, and policies that treat content neutrally while enforcing abuse mitigation. Pricing models for .sucks domains often include premium tiers for high‑value strings, which can influence registration behavior and renewal patterns. We monitor .sucks websites for deployment trends, such as redirects to brand hubs, standalone review portals, and parked holdings used for monitoring sentiment. Dispute mechanisms like UDRP and URS apply as with other gTLDs, shaping how conflicts are resolved. These structural elements frame adoption, usage, and longevity. Compare historical curves and portfolio compositions in webatla’s .sucks datasets.

Why and who choose the .sucks domain

Organizations and individuals choose the .sucks domain for distinct strategic reasons. Brands secure .sucks domains defensively to manage risk, direct complaints to official channels, or consolidate feedback. Advocacy groups and consumers use .sucks websites for critique, review aggregation, or issue‑specific campaigns that demand memorable, expressive naming. From a performance standpoint, the string itself does not confer ranking advantages; outcomes depend on content quality, links, and user behavior, while some registrants opt for redirects to mainstream properties. We analyze purchaser profiles, hosting geographies, SSL adoption, and resolution status to map active versus passive usage. These data reveal clusters: corporate portfolios, activist networks, and speculative holdings with premium terms. Evaluate fit by comparing patterns against your objectives. Explore webatla’s .sucks datasets for sector‑level insights.