.review domains list

What is .review TLD

The .review TLD is a generic top‑level domain intended for content centered on evaluations, ratings, and commentary. As a namespace, it helps label review‑oriented resources across sectors—consumer goods, software, travel, media—making intent clear before a click. We see .review domains used by individuals, publishers, and organizations to host editorial assessments, user feedback hubs, and comparison catalogs; many such .review websites consolidate structured ratings or citation‑backed critiques. Registration is generally open worldwide with standard DNS features; security and privacy options depend on registrar offerings. From an information architecture view, the extension can segment review traffic from brand sites, aiding navigation and data governance. We compile cross‑market adoption, resolution rates, and hosting profiles for this TLD. Explore .review domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .review TLD

Introduced during ICANN’s 2010s new‑gTLD expansion, the .review TLD follows the model of open, first‑come registration with familiar technical baselines (standard DNS, DNSSEC support at many providers). Historically, adoption shows typical early bursts of speculative registrations, followed by consolidation as active .review websites emerge around niche topics and long‑tail products. We analyze life‑cycle patterns—creation spikes, renewals, redirects, and developed .review domains versus parked holdings—to understand durability and use. Naming tends toward descriptive phrases, SKU or model identifiers, and geographic qualifiers, reflecting search intent. Compliance considerations (disclosure of incentives, moderation of user reviews) vary by jurisdiction, influencing site architecture. Our datasets surface registrar concentration, hosting geodiversity, and change velocity for this TLD. Browse .review domain datasets from webatla.

Why and who choose the .review domain

Organizations choose the .review domain to signal purpose‑built critique spaces: independent reviewers, consumer forums, affiliate comparison publishers, app marketplaces, hospitality and local‑service evaluators, and brands separating feedback hubs from corporate sites. For search, explicit semantics can help users understand relevance, though rankings depend on broader quality signals. We observe .review websites prioritizing structured data, transparent methodologies, and clear moderation to build trust; conversely, weak disclosure or thin content undermines impact. For portfolio holders, .review domains can segment campaigns, test content strategies, or capture long‑tail queries aligned with product models. International teams value the neutrality of the label across languages and markets. We profile active usage, content types, and longevity to benchmark outcomes. Examine .review domain datasets from webatla.