Download websites that use Froala Editor

About Froala Editor

Froala Editor is not something a site visitor is meant to notice. The product is a rich text editing component that gets embedded inside an application, so its code arrives on pages where somebody is expected to write: an admin panel, a support console, a listing form, a page builder inside a product. Seeing it on a domain tells you the site is an application with authoring in it, not a brochure.

The component dates to 2014 and is written in JavaScript, with wrappers for the frontend frameworks teams actually build on. Licensing is Proprietary and sold per developer or per deployment, which is what gives the dataset its commercial edge. Nobody ends up with this editor by accident. Somebody compared it against free alternatives, argued for the budget, and signed a purchase order, and that internal decision becomes visible from outside the company on any page where the editor loads.

Detection has an obvious blind spot. Editors live behind logins, and the pages we can fetch are public ones, so a product that loads its editor only after authentication will not show up. What we do catch is the wide middle ground: public comment and review forms, front-end submission flows, marketing sites built on the vendor's own components, and applications careless enough to ship one shared asset bundle on every page. The figures are best treated as a lower bound on adoption and a fair sample of who adopts.

As of September 2026 the editor is detected on 89,080 sites. United States contributes 56,946 of those, and .com is the common suffix, a distribution typical of paid developer tooling, where purchasing concentrates in the market with the deepest software budgets and the closest sales coverage from Froala. Country data for a component like this describes where the buying company is registered rather than where its users are, which matters if you are sizing a market rather than an audience.

The people who get value from the full list are usually selling something adjacent. Competing editor vendors treat it as a displacement target, since every entry is a company that already pays for this category and needs only a reason to switch. Component and low-code vendors read it as a map of which industries build authoring into their own products, which is a reasonable proxy for where document workflows are being rebuilt as software. Analysts use it to size a market that publishes no numbers of its own.

A per-domain lookup answers whether one company bought the editor. The list answers how many did, in which sectors, alongside which other purchased components, and how that population moves between releases and competitors over time. Those are counting questions, and counting questions need the whole set.