.net.id domains list

What is .net.id TLD

.net.id is the network-oriented second-level country-code domain within Indonesia’s .id namespace, designated for organizations operating connectivity, infrastructure, or related services. It sits beneath the ccTLD, following a structured naming model in which registrants typically publish .net.id domains that resolve to .net.id websites aligned with Indonesian presence or operations. In practice, carriers, ISPs, hosting providers, and integrators adopt it to signal network roles and local footprint across Jakarta, regional hubs, and cross-border routes. From an analysis perspective, we see predictable naming patterns, provider clusters, and ASN-linked footprints that aid attribution and market mapping. For geotargeting, trust cues, and routing expectations, the label conveys Indonesia-specific intent without prescribing content scope. Explore .net.id domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .net.id TLD

The .net.id hierarchy emerged as part of the early structured rollout of Indonesia’s .id space, alongside sectoral second-level labels. While policies have evolved over time, .net.id domains have remained associated with network and infrastructure contexts, and .net.id websites frequently front customer portals, NOC pages, peering information, and service status assets. Technically, the zone operates under .id registry standards with contemporary DNS practices, registrar channels, and normal WHOIS/RDAP exposure that enable consistent discovery and classification. We observe recurrent conventions: peering, resolver, and mail hostnames; reverse-DNS alignments; and IPv4/IPv6 dual-stack adoption typical of carriers. Such traits support reliable entity resolution, incident response, and supply‑chain mapping when combined with BGP and certificate datasets. Explore .net.id domain datasets from webatla for deeper evidence.

Why and who choose the .net.id domain

Organizations prioritizing Indonesian network presence often select .net.id to signal operational scope and regulatory familiarity. Typical adopters include ISPs, telecom groups, backbone providers, cloud and CDN nodes, cybersecurity firms, and universities running research networks; their .net.id domains commonly underpin resolvers, provisioning systems, and landing pages for .net.id websites serving local users. The choice can improve geotargeting signals, align with procurement expectations, and simplify peer recognition in regional exchanges, while the multi‑label structure may lengthen names compared with globally generic options. For brand portfolios, we recommend evaluating coexistence with .id and .com to balance recognition, compliance, and routing clarity across channels. Explore .net.id domain datasets from webatla to guide decisions.