.foo domains list

What is .foo TLD

The .foo TLD is a generic top-level domain operated by Google Registry and positioned as a secure namespace on the public internet. In practical terms, .foo domains are open to general registrants, while .foo websites are required to serve content over HTTPS, reflecting an HTTPS‑by‑default posture. We observe adoption by developer‑focused projects and experimentation, where security expectations and modern tooling align with the extension’s intent. From a technical perspective, enforced encryption narrows downgrade and interception risks and can influence choices around redirects, certificates, and hosting configurations. These traits make .foo comparable to other security‑forward namespaces while remaining general‑purpose. Learn more from our continuously updated .foo datasets at webatla. ([registry.google](https://www.registry.google/tlds/foo/?utm_source=openai))

History and key features of .foo TLD

Originating within Google’s secure TLD program, .foo matured alongside other HSTS‑preloaded spaces aimed at default encryption. Today, .foo domains benefit from mandatory HTTPS, modern registry features such as DNSSEC and IDN support, and first‑come, first‑served availability through mainstream registrars. .foo websites inherit browser behavior that enforces encrypted connections, reducing misconfiguration risk but requiring certificates and compatible forwarding. Policy nuances include guidance for two‑letter labels to avoid implied government affiliation and reserved‑name protections common across new gTLDs. We track issuance velocity, nameserver diversity, and adoption patterns to benchmark .foo against sibling secure namespaces and broader gTLD cohorts. Explore our longitudinal .foo dataset coverage at webatla. ([wired.com](https://www.wired.com/story/google-encrypted-top-level-domains?utm_source=openai))

Why and who choose the .foo domain

Teams selecting .foo domains typically prioritize a development‑centric identity and HTTPS‑everywhere assurance. For .foo websites, the enforced TLS model fits engineering portals, documentation hubs, sandbox services, and proof‑of‑concept deployments where transport security is non‑negotiable. Operationally, registrants should plan for certificate automation, HSTS‑compatible redirects, and hosting or forwarding solutions that support SSL; some basic forwarding utilities may not function without HTTPS. We see usage across startups, open‑source maintainers, and enterprises creating distinct technical brands or internal‑facing endpoints. Our analytics surface renewal behavior, registrar concentration, and DNS resilience to inform portfolio decisions. Review our evidence‑based .foo intelligence at webatla. ([registry.google](https://www.registry.google/policies/registration/foo/?utm_source=openai))