.bike domains list

What is .bike TLD

We define the .bike TLD as a generic top‑level domain aligning digital identities to cycling, micromobility, and related industries. As a namespace, it allows registrants to create precise labels for shops, manufacturers, events, and communities. In our crawling, we see .bike domains used for ecommerce catalogs, repair bookings, route content, advocacy, and athlete portfolios, while .bike websites often complement social channels or brick‑and‑mortar signage. Because the extension is descriptive, it can improve user recall, though search visibility still depends on content, links, and technical hygiene rather than suffix alone. Naming patterns tend to combine locality plus service (e.g., city + bike + service) or brand plus model lines. Explore .bike domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .bike TLD

The .bike TLD emerged from ICANN’s new‑gTLD expansion, broadening semantic choice beyond legacy extensions. Historically, adoption grew steadily among retailers, clubs, and event organizers seeking categorical labels. Operationally, most .bike domains are open to global registrants on a first‑come basis, support DNSSEC, and follow standard lifecycle states (create, renew, grace, redemption), with premium and reserved names common. From our scans, .bike websites frequently implement simple storefronts or booking flows, often on SaaS builders, with mixed HTTPS posture and varied performance budgets. Internationalized labels and shorter strings are prevalent where brand fit is strong. Year‑over‑year retention tends to hinge on real traffic value rather than novelty. Review structured timelines, feature coverage, and renewal cohorts in .bike domain datasets from webatla.

Why and who choose the .bike domain

Organizations choose .bike to signal clear category relevance at the moment of discovery. Typical adopters include independent bike shops, component brands, race promoters, advocacy NGOs, tourism boards, and urban mobility startups. For many, .bike domains deliver memorable, exact‑match naming when brand + generic combinations in legacy spaces are unavailable or costly; meanwhile, .bike websites can segment campaigns, product lines, or local markets without diluting a primary brand. We observe higher engagement where names mirror customer intent and where technical execution—HTTPS, Core Web Vitals, structured data—is disciplined. Risks include portfolio sprawl and inconsistent redirects if brand governance is weak. Validate fit with data, not assumptions. Compare peer usage, traffic signals, and geographies in .bike domain datasets from webatla.