Download websites that use Upserve

About Upserve

The interesting thing about Upserve is which half of the product ends up on the public web. Restaurant technology is mostly back of house, running on terminals, tablets and payment hardware that no crawler will ever see. Ordering is the exception, because a customer has to reach it in a browser, and the ordering surface is what our fingerprint matches.

The platform dates to 2009, our record names Upserve as the supplier, and the licence is Proprietary. Ownership of a restaurant platform can change hands more than once without the product changing its name or its ordering pages, so the vendor column is best read as the label our record carries rather than as a settled statement about who bills the venue this month. A venue still serving this ordering experience is telling you two things at once: the business took online ordering seriously enough to run it through a dedicated hospitality vendor rather than a generic checkout, and the ordering surface it launched with is still the one its customers meet.

Who wants the resulting list? Payment providers and delivery marketplaces prospect against exactly this signal, because a venue taking orders on its own domain has already demonstrated that it will not simply hand the customer relationship to an aggregator. Competing point of sale vendors care for the opposite reason, because every venue on the list is already paying somebody else for the ordering layer and the switching conversation starts from a known incumbent. Restaurant groups, franchise operators and market researchers use the same file to size a segment that is otherwise close to invisible, because independent venues file none of the disclosures that make a sector countable.

As of October 2026 we match Upserve on 132 sites. We publish no country field and no domain-suffix split for the platform, so anyone who needs a geographic cut will have to derive it from the domains themselves rather than from a column we can stand behind. Saying that outright is more useful than shipping a number nobody checked.

The count should be read as sites where the ordering integration is visible in the delivered page, which is narrower than the number of businesses using the platform. A single operator can run several venues behind one domain, and a venue whose ordering link points at a vendor-hosted subdomain instead of its own site may never be attributed to it at all. Undercounting in that direction is the honest failure mode of any fingerprint that reads only what the public page contains, and the alternative, inflating a figure with assumptions, is not something a buyer can audit.