Download websites that use FreakOut

About FreakOut

An advertising tag says less about what a site publishes than about who it sells its audience to. FreakOut sits on the buying side of programmatic advertising, and the code we match sits on the publisher side of the same relationship, so each detection is a statement about how a site is monetized. Somebody decided that inventory on those pages would be filled through this network, and that decision usually reflects where the site's audience is and which sales house serves it.

As of October 2026 we see the tag on 16 sites. The vendor of record is FreakOut Holdings, the platform is Proprietary and dates to 2010, and the company's own site sits on a Japanese domain, which is as far as the structured facts let us go on where the business is anchored. Our country data for this entry is empty, so no geographic distribution will be claimed here. Anyone who needs the geography can take the domain list and derive it from the country-code suffixes and hosting records in the export, which is a sounder method than trusting a description anyway.

Detections in the Advertising category have a property that makes them more useful than they look. A publisher rarely runs one network alone, so the domains carrying this tag also carry a stack of others, and the combination is the interesting object: which networks are stacked together, which bidding wrappers accompany them, which analytics and consent tools appear on the same pages. A single-domain lookup returns a yes or a no. The full list returns a map of who monetizes with whom.

The caveat is that tags load in layers. Where the code is injected through a tag manager, or through a wrapper that fires only for certain visitors or certain regions, a crawl may never see it, so the count is a floor and the misses are not random. Publishers with geo-conditional monetization are precisely the ones most likely to be undercounted, which matters because that is the group a regional network would be strongest in. For a sales team at a competing network, an agency planning where to buy, or anyone running diligence on the vendor, the sound way to read the export is as a confirmed subset. Every domain in it really did serve the tag when we looked, and the domains outside it are unproven rather than clean.