Download websites that use Vev

About Vev

Most platforms we track are chosen once and then sit on a domain for years. A Page builders used for campaign pages and interactive editorial features works on a different clock, and Vev sits firmly in that second group. A brand or a publisher builds a piece, publishes it under a subdomain or a path, leaves it up while the campaign runs and then quietly retires it. As of October 2026 we detect Vev on 127 sites.

A count of that kind is a snapshot of activity rather than a stock of installations. Repeat crawls of the same market will not return an identical set of Vev pages, and the difference between them is signal rather than noise, because it separates the brands producing interactive content continuously from the ones that produced a single piece and stopped. Anyone tracking this market should read our figure as the population that was live at the moment we looked, and should compare successive refreshes rather than treating any one of them as the answer.

Vev AS sells the product under a Proprietary model as a hosted service, which shapes how the list should be read in a couple of ways. Everything detected is an active account rather than a leftover free install that nobody remembers, so the set carries commercial meaning without further filtering. Delivery also runs through vendor infrastructure, which is where the identifying markers live, in asset host names and script bundles. A customer serving a Vev built page entirely through their own domain and their own cache can be invisible to us, so the number is a floor.

Vev reached the market in 2017, late enough that its adoption tracks a specific shift rather than a general trend. Interactive campaign and editorial production has been moving out of agency development queues and into design teams who want to ship without a build pipeline, and a footprint like this one is a way to measure how far that move has actually gone. The people who want the underlying domain list are usually mapping exactly that. Agencies use it to see which brands have taken interactive production in house and which are still buying it externally. Vendors of adjacent tooling, meaning analytics, video hosting, consent management and digital asset libraries, use it as a qualified list of design led teams with a budget and a habit of publishing. A per domain lookup cannot answer any of it, because the question is about a category of buyer rather than about one company.