Download websites that use Nativo

About Nativo

Native advertising code does not arrive on a website by accident. Nativo sits in the Advertising stack on the publisher side rather than the advertiser side, which means the code runs on a content site and dresses paid placements in the host page's own typography and layout so they read as part of the feed. Finding Nativo on a domain is a reasonable signal that the domain earns money from its audience, and that someone there runs an ad operations function, however small.

Our record names Life360 against the entry, and the platform has been in the market since 2010, which places it in the generation of advertising technology built after plain display banners stopped performing and before programmatic buying consolidated around header bidding. Ownership of an advertising platform can change hands while the tag on the page keeps its original name, so the operator behind a detection is worth confirming rather than assuming. Licensing is Proprietary, so every install represents a commercial relationship rather than a package someone pulled from a public repository. A researcher can take that literally. Each detection corresponds to a publisher who signed something, not to a developer who copied a snippet out of a tutorial.

As of September 2026 we detect Nativo on 475 sites. The figure is smaller than the audience the platform reaches, and the gap is the point. Native formats concentrate in a fairly narrow band of medium and large publishers, so a few hundred domains can represent a very large volume of monthly page views. Anyone sizing this market from install counts alone will underestimate it, and anyone treating the install list as a set of publishers with real traffic will be closer to right.

Detection here is client side. We record the technology when the advertising script is present in the delivered page, so pages that load it only for some visitors, only in certain geographies, or only after a consent prompt is accepted can be missed. Publishers who tested the platform and removed it leave nothing behind either. The count should be read as a floor for active deployments rather than a census of every contract in force.

Two kinds of buyer use a list like this. Advertising technology vendors want the set of publishers already monetising with a native format, because those publishers have proven budget authority and an existing yield problem to argue about. Analysts and competitors want the shape of the market instead: which content verticals adopt native placements, how the publisher tail compares with the head, and whether a given network is gaining or shedding domains between releases. A per domain lookup answers whether one site runs the tag. The downloadable dataset answers the reverse question, which is who all of them are, and the reverse question is the one that supports a prospect list, a market map or a time series.