Download websites that use GSAP

About GSAP

Animation is discretionary. A site can sell, inform and convert without any of it, so a page loading a dedicated animation library is a page where somebody decided motion was worth the bytes, the build time and the testing. GSAP is a JavaScript frameworks from GreenSock that has been in use since 2008, written in JavaScript and aimed at the part of the craft where timelines, easing and scroll-driven sequences matter more than a plain CSS transition can express.

Sites making that decision are not a random sample of the web. A motion library of this kind turns up on agency work, product launches, portfolios, brand microsites and campaign pages, which is to say on projects with a design lead, a budget and a client who cared how the result felt. For anybody selling into the creative and marketing web, the population reads as a shortlist of sites where design was a line item rather than an afterthought.

As of October 2026 we see the library on 280,787 sites, 93,380 of them resolving to United States, with the domain mix concentrating in .com. Geography of design-led work follows agency markets, so the distribution resembles a map of where creative work is commissioned more than a map of technology adoption.

The licence is recorded as Freemium, and freemium licensing is precisely where inference should stop. Presence on a page cannot separate a paid commercial licence from free use, cannot reveal which plugins are loaded from inside a bundle, and cannot say whether the animation is central to the site or a leftover in a theme somebody bought and never stripped. Anyone considering the list for licence enforcement rather than sales research should treat it as a starting point and nothing more than that.

There is a technical limit too, and it runs in one direction only. A copy served from a content delivery network or a public script path is straightforward to see. A copy compiled into an application bundle, renamed by minification and shipped as part of a framework build often is not, so the recorded sites lean toward those that included the library the simple way. The count is a floor, and the missing sites skew toward heavier engineering builds rather than being scattered at random. Even with that gap, the visible population answers something no per-domain lookup can, which is where across the whole web motion work is actually being commissioned and paid for.