.codes domains list

What is .codes TLD

.codes is a generic top‑level domain centered on the idea of “code.” Registration is open to anyone, yet its semantics naturally attract software creators, documentation teams, and technical communities. In our crawl of .codes domains and .codes websites, we see usage ranging from personal portfolios to API endpoints and knowledge bases. Contextually, the string signals programming relevance across languages and frameworks, making it useful for labeling repositories, snippets, or developer portals. From analysis, names skew toward short verbs and project identifiers, with high rates of HTTPS, CI/CD hosting, and redirects to Git platforms. Typosquatting risk exists when project names overlap. We track hosting, DNS, and certificate patterns to benchmark resilience and authenticity. Explore webatla’s .codes domain datasets to quantify adoption and risk.

History and key features of .codes TLD

.codes emerged in the first wave of ICANN’s new gTLD expansion in the mid‑2010s, broadening namespace options beyond legacy suffixes. While details vary by registry policy, eligibility is global and non‑restricted, so .codes domains are obtainable through standard accredited registrars. For .codes websites, we observe typical modern stack traits: DNSSEC capability at the zone, widespread TLS, and CDN usage for documentation delivery. Feature‑wise, naming tends to compress function and project scope (e.g., verbs plus nouns), and premium tiers influence availability of ultra‑short strings. Rights protection mechanisms—sunrise, trademark claims, and abuse reporting—mirror common gTLD practices. Our longitudinal scans highlight churn around hackathon cycles and release cadences, suggesting seasonal registration bursts. We provide normalized metadata to compare .codes against peer technical TLDs. Compare cohorts in webatla’s .codes domain datasets for deeper due diligence.

Why and who choose the .codes domain

Organizations select .codes to foreground software purpose without prescribing language or framework. Typical adopters include dev‑tool vendors, consultancies, open‑source maintainers, hackathon teams, and training providers; individuals use .codes domains for portfolios, snippet archives, or micro‑services. Among .codes websites, we frequently detect documentation hubs, API gateways, project landing pages, and redirects to repository hosts, reflecting lifecycle‑driven communication. The rationale is pragmatic: descriptive naming, clearer intent in search, and higher likelihood of exact‑match project names compared with saturated legacy TLDs. Risks include fragmentation across multiple branded TLDs and potential confusion with code‑hosting subpaths. We model resolution patterns, uptime, and backlink profiles to assess durability and audience fit by segment and geography. Interrogate audiences and outcomes in webatla’s .codes domain datasets.