.or.at domains list

What is .or.at TLD

The .or.at label is part of Austria’s .at country‑code hierarchy rather than a standalone top‑level domain. In practice, registrations under .or.at appear as third‑level names (example.or.at), and .or.at domains typically indicate organizational or association use within the Austrian context. For users and crawlers, .or.at websites convey geographic relevance, language expectations, and a non‑commercial orientation. We treat this namespace as a structured signal alongside content, hosting, and DNS metadata to build reliable domain intelligence. Our datasets track lifecycle events, registrar patterns, and naming conventions across the .at tree to benchmark the .or.at segment. Our crawl summaries cover .or.at domains and .or.at websites with comparable, reproducible metrics. Explore .or.at domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .or.at TLD

Historically, .at adopted structured second‑level labels—such as .co.at, .or.at, and .priv.at—to signal intended registrant types and improve namespace clarity. While policy details have evolved, .or.at domains remain aligned with organizational identities, with registrations processed through accredited registrars operating under the .at registry’s rules. From a technical standpoint, .at implements contemporary DNS practices, and .or.at websites inherit those characteristics, supporting stable resolution, modern security options, and localization needs. We analyze creation and renewal velocities, host distribution, and name‑length trends to profile this segment over time. Compared with other .at spaces, .or.at domains show distinct naming semantics and sectoral clustering that help classify entities and estimate audience geography. Review our longitudinal metrics across .or.at websites to understand adoption dynamics. Browse webatla’s .or.at domain datasets today.

Why and who choose the .or.at domain

Organizations prioritizing Austrian affinity and clarity of purpose often choose .or.at to signal mission‑driven activity. In our crawls, .or.at domains are prevalent among associations, clubs, nonprofits, foundations, and consortia; some commercial entities also use the label when the organizational identity outweighs product branding. For search and user recognition, .or.at websites communicate local relevance without implying government (.gv.at) or academic (.ac.at) affiliation, aiding audience targeting and trust heuristics. We evaluate how link graphs, language detection, and hosting geography align with sector tags to profile likely registrant types and content themes. Decision‑makers comparing .or.at with open .at registrations should consider naming availability, audience expectations, and governance signals before committing. Examine our segmentation findings on .or.at domains and benchmark them against peer namespaces. Investigate .or.at domain datasets with webatla.