.am.in domains list

What is .am.in TLD

Despite the label, .am.in is not a top-level domain in the DNS root; it is a third‑level registration space beneath India’s country-code .in, dependent on the policies and delegation of the am.in second level. In practice, .am.in domains function like any structured subdomain namespace: availability, eligibility, and lifecycle are determined by whoever operates am.in. For users and researchers, .am.in websites can mirror local, organizational, or experimental purposes rather than broad national use. We analyze this zone by mapping DNS records, hosting geographies, SSL deployment, and content signals to understand behavior and risk posture across .am.in domains and associated .am.in websites. Explore .am.in domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .am.in TLD

Because .in allows delegated second-level structures, spaces like .am.in can emerge for specialized communities or operators. Historical documentation for am.in is limited publicly, so we treat .am.in domains as a micro-namespace and emphasize observable signals over assumptions. Key features we evaluate include registrar concentration (if any), nameserver diversity, DNSSEC presence, renewal cadence, and the ratio of active .am.in websites to parked or redirect hosts. Cross-year comparisons reveal whether launches, bulk registrations, or hygiene sweeps occurred and how infrastructure shifted. These metrics help benchmark resilience and misuse exposure relative to peer third-level zones. Review webatla’s time-series metrics and snapshots for .am.in domain datasets.

Why and who choose the .am.in domain

Organizations choose .am.in when they want a narrowly scoped identity under India’s .in while aligning to policies set by the am.in operator. Typical adopters may include regional initiatives, internal projects, or branded microsites where short labels remain available. From an SEO standpoint, .am.in websites are treated like any other hostname; relevance, content, and links drive visibility more than label length. The trade-offs involve dependency on operator stability, possible registration constraints, and variable user trust compared to well-known .in second-levels. We help assess fit by profiling traffic, hosting, and security posture across .am.in domains to inform risk and brand decisions. Explore our .am.in domain datasets at webatla.