Download websites that use Qualified

Most chat widgets exist to answer questions. Qualified exists to intercept a buying committee. The distinction matters for anyone reading this dataset, because support chat on a site tells you the company has customers, while a conversational sales tool tells you the company has a sales team paid to work inbound traffic while the visitor is still on the page.

A word of caution about the label first. The product name is an ordinary English word, and our detection is a fingerprint match on the delivered code rather than a reading of the page, so nothing here should be taken as a claim about any other product or company that uses the same word. What we can stand behind is the code signature, the vendor recorded as Qualified.com Inc., the Proprietary licensing and the JavaScript implementation.

The recorded category is Live chat, but the buyer is not a support organisation. Tooling of this kind is bought by revenue teams, deployed on the marketing site rather than inside the product, and configured around which accounts are visiting rather than which questions get asked. The product reached the market in 2018, late enough that it was designed for a world where enterprise software selling already ran on account intelligence and a customer record system of its own.

As of October 2026 we detect Qualified on 522 sites, which is small and ought to be. Software priced for enterprise revenue teams will never show a large install base, and a modest count here corresponds to a large amount of contracted spend per domain. Reading these numbers as popularity is the error to avoid. The correct reading is that each detection marks a company that has decided its website is a pipeline source and has attached budget to the decision.

Detection limits are the usual client side ones plus one that bites harder here. Widgets that load only for visitors matching a targeting rule, only on certain pages, or only after a consent prompt can be missed entirely, and a tool built around targeting particular accounts is more likely than most to be loaded conditionally. So the count is a floor rather than a roster.

The list answers a question no per domain lookup can. Anyone selling into revenue operations, or mapping the accounts a competing platform has won, needs the population rather than the instance: which companies run this motion, what else sits in their stack, and how the set changes between releases. Checking one domain confirms a single vendor's presence. The extract makes the whole segment visible at once.