Download websites that use JUST

The name is the problem with this entry. Our record for JUST points at a vendor site that presents itself in Spanish as restaurant management and online ordering software sold into Latin American markets, and the older description we inherited calls it a minimalist site builder, a claim neither that site nor the rest of our facts supports. Short, generic product names get reused across unrelated companies, and a fingerprint matching a common name can gather more than one product into a single row. Read this page accordingly. What we can stand behind is that a recognisable signature filed under Payment processors appears on a set of live domains, not that every one of those domains runs the same company's software.

As of October 2026 we detect JUST on 151 sites. Beyond the count, the Proprietary classification is the only other fact we hold, which at least rules out a self hosted open source population and points to a service somebody signed up for. Our data carries no first release year, no implementation language, no version history and no country or top level domain concentration, and inventing any of that from the name would be worse than leaving it blank.

A Payment processors tag is normally worth counting because it says the site owner did not hire a developer, which puts a domain in a different commercial bracket from one built by an agency. The reading only holds when the label is right, and here nobody can promise the label is right.

For a researcher the practical advice is to treat this row as a starting point rather than an answer. The value of the export in a case like this is that the domains are listed individually, so a handful can be opened and inspected to establish what the signature actually indicates before any of it feeds outreach or analysis. A per domain lookup would hand you the same ambiguous label with no way to check it. A full list lets you verify the label yourself, which is the honest way to use a thin entry.