.tm.ro domains list

What is .tm.ro TLD

We define .tm.ro as a delegated, regional second-level space within Romania’s .ro country-code top-level domain. Registrations under it create third‑level .tm.ro domains (e.g., name.tm.ro) designed to signal presence around Timiș/Timișoara or Romanian regional affiliation. In practice, .tm.ro websites appear across local commerce, public services, cultural projects, and location‑specific landing pages for national or international brands. From an intelligence perspective, we see concentrated NAP data, geolocated content, and inbound links clustered within western Romania, giving .tm.ro a clear topical and geographic profile. Such signals help segmentation, brand safety evaluations, and region‑level competitive mapping. For rigorous research, we aggregate crawl, WHOIS, DNS, and web graph telemetry to analyze .tm.ro domains at scale. Explore webatla’s .tm.ro datasets for structured regional insights.

History and key features of .tm.ro TLD

The .tm.ro space emerged as Romania expanded second‑level geographic zones beneath the .ro ccTLD, administered by the national registry and operated through accredited registrars. While precise launch milestones are sparsely documented, policy and technical baselines align with .ro conventions, so .tm.ro domains typically inherit the same DNS infrastructure, lifecycle states, and dispute norms. In our corpus, .tm.ro websites skew toward organizations emphasizing local identity, while larger brands use them for localized microsites, redirects, or community programs. Key features include geographic signaling, availability determined at the third‑level label, and governance dependent on .ro policy rather than a distinct TLD authority. For longitudinal context, we track registration churn, host density, and nameserver concentration to surface durable patterns across .tm.ro domains. Examine webatla’s .tm.ro datasets for longitudinal patterns.

Why and who choose the .tm.ro domain

Organizations choose .tm.ro domains to communicate strong regional relevance, align with Timiș/Timișoara audiences, and cluster digital assets by territory without relinquishing .ro brand equity. For search and discovery, .tm.ro websites can reinforce geo‑intent, local citation networks, and language cues, supporting location‑specific campaigns and service areas. We observe adoption by SMEs, municipal bodies, cultural venues, sports clubs, universities, and national brands operating regional franchises. Trade‑offs include lower international recognition versus .ro and added length from third‑level structures, which some teams offset with concise labels and canonicalization. Decision‑makers should evaluate portfolio consistency, backlink geography, and hosting locality before committing. We surface entity resolution, resolver hygiene, and risk signals to guide selection across .tm.ro domains. Explore webatla’s .tm.ro datasets to benchmark this namespace.