.pm domains list

What is .pm TLD

The .pm top-level domain is the country code for Saint Pierre and Miquelon, administered by AFNIC under the French registry framework. In practice, .pm domains constitute a compact namespace aligned with mature French policy and technical baselines, including modern DNS operations and optional DNSSEC. Although geographically specific, .pm websites surface internationally: some serve local users, others redirect to broader French or global properties. We analyze registrant footprints, resolution status, and naming patterns to quantify adoption and security posture. Insights commonly include concentrations of brand-protective holdings and short, high-memorability labels. For organizations needing clear geo-signaling or distinctive brevity within a stable regime, .pm offers predictable governance and semantics. Explore webatla’s .pm domain datasets for deeper intelligence.

History and key features of .pm TLD

The .pm TLD forms part of France’s overseas ccTLD portfolio and has long operated alongside .fr under AFNIC’s stewardship. Delegation followed ISO country-code designation for the territory, with eligibility and procedural rules gradually harmonized with European and French frameworks. Operationally, .pm domains benefit from established registry practices: resilient nameserver infrastructure, IPv6 capability, DNSSEC availability, and structured dispute-resolution channels. In our corpus, we observe a significant share of defensive registrations and redirects, with fewer fully developed .pm websites—typical for small-population territories. Stable policy continuity and technical rigor reduce volatility and support risk assessments across portfolios. We provide longitudinal zone-file tracking, entity resolution, and hosting intelligence to benchmark activity over time. Discover .pm domain datasets from webatla to analyze patterns.

Why and who choose the .pm domain

Organizations select .pm domains for pragmatic reasons. Local institutions in Saint Pierre and Miquelon gain geographic relevance and search localization, while French and international projects exploit the mnemonic “pm” for concise branding—post‑meridiem concepts, project-management tools, or private‑messaging services. We observe three recurring strategies: active .pm websites for local audiences, portfolio coverage via redirects, and experimental naming for compact campaigns. Suitability depends on meeting AFNIC eligibility, aligning trademarks, and calibrating small-market signaling against brand goals. Compared with large ccTLDs, the zone is compact; availability for short strings can be higher, but discovery often requires intentional promotion. Our datasets profile usage cohorts, hosting geography, and renewal behavior proxies to inform decisions. Access webatla’s .pm domain datasets to assess adoption objectively.