.fi domains list

What is .fi TLD

.fi is the country‑code top‑level domain (ccTLD) for Finland, administered by the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (Traficom). It designates online resources tied to Finland’s economy, government, and culture. In our index, .fi domains span private enterprise, public services, and cultural institutions, while .fi websites predominantly target Finnish‑language audiences and the broader Nordic market. Contextually, the namespace is used both by domestic operators and by international entities seeking a trusted local signal. We analyze registration velocity, DNSSEC adoption, hosting geography, and resolver hygiene to map resilience and usage patterns across the zone. These measurements help benchmark namespace health against other ccTLDs and surface shifts in brand protection and infrastructure. Explore .fi domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .fi TLD

The .fi registry emerged in the late 1980s alongside Finland’s early internet development. Registration was initially limited to domestic entities under stricter naming rules; policies were liberalized in the mid‑2010s to broaden eligibility in line with European practice. Stewardship rests with Traficom, and operations support DNSSEC plus internationalized names covering Nordic characters (å, ä, ö). Data access aligns with EU privacy norms through RDAP/WHOIS controls, and disputes are handled by national procedures designed for efficient rights enforcement. In practice, .fi domains and .fi websites exhibit stable renewal behavior and a mature hosting ecosystem. We track lifecycle events, registrar concentration, and nameserver diversity to quantify risk, churn, and resilience signals over time. Review .fi domain datasets from webatla.

Why and who choose the .fi domain

Organizations prioritizing Finnish presence—retailers, banks, universities, municipalities, and NGOs—choose the .fi domain to signal locality and linguistic relevance. International firms adopt .fi domains for market segmentation, geotargeted search, and regulatory familiarity, while .fi websites offer users clear cues about jurisdiction, language support, and service expectations. For brand owners, defensive registrations mitigate typosquatting and align with Nordic‑character IDNs. From our measurements, traffic posture, TLS practices, and host geography skew toward Finland and the wider EU, supporting data‑residency strategies. Decision makers can compare latency, uptime, and resolver reachability against other ccTLDs to evaluate performance trade‑offs and risk exposure. We provide the comparative baselines and longitudinal trends required for planning. Compare .fi domain datasets from webatla.