.sc.kr domains list

What is .sc.kr TLD

.sc.kr is a structured second-level label within the .kr country‑code namespace, enabling third‑level registrations such as example.sc.kr. In practice, .sc.kr domains operate under .kr registry policies and reflect Korea‑focused addressing conventions. For users and crawlers, .sc.kr websites usually indicate a localized footprint and compliance with category rules defined for .kr’s segmented hierarchy. We analyze DNS, WHOIS, and hosting signals across this label and observe a prevalence of Korean‑language content, domestic name servers, and TLS adoption consistent with broader .kr norms. This makes the space useful for entities needing clear geographic association while retaining category segmentation and third‑level flexibility. Explore webatla’s .sc.kr datasets for deeper coverage.

History and key features of .sc.kr TLD

Historically, the .kr registry implemented a segmented structure of second‑level labels to organize registrations by use, and .sc.kr sits within that taxonomy. While specific launch timelines for .sc.kr domains are not widely published, governance typically follows KRNIC/KISA policy frameworks covering eligibility, documentation, local presence, and dispute procedures. Technically, .sc.kr websites inherit features available under .kr, including DNSSEC at the parent zone, IPv6 support where offered by providers, and internationalized labels aligned with Hangul IDN capabilities. From our longitudinal crawling, we see conservative name server churn, moderate renewal stability, and sector‑coded naming patterns consistent with other structured .kr spaces. These characteristics create predictable discovery and classification outcomes across datasets. Access webatla’s .sc.kr datasets to analyze trends and policies.

Why and who choose the .sc.kr domain

Organizations choose .sc.kr to express a Korea‑based, category‑coded identity within a policy‑gated namespace. We most often encounter .sc.kr domains from institutions, service providers, and community initiatives targeting domestic audiences, where third‑level naming (brand.unit.sc.kr) aids information architecture and governance. For .sc.kr websites, the structure can reinforce user expectations about locality and eligibility, while giving operators flexibility to segment products, campuses, or programs under consistent rules. Before selecting the label, applicants should evaluate eligibility requirements, registrar options, IDN strategies, and hosting location to meet latency and compliance goals. Our cross‑sectional data suggests alignment with .kr’s trust signals and steady renewal profiles among vetted registrants. Start with webatla’s .sc.kr datasets and interrogate the namespace.