Download websites that use Userflow

Two ordinary words that every product manager says in meetings make a poor thing to search for. A crawl looking for the phrase in page text or class names would come back with documentation, design-system comments and unrelated code, which is why a fingerprint and a keyword search are not the same instrument and should not be trusted to the same degree.

Our record for Userflow is bare. Name and count are present, while vendor, license, category, language, first year and version data are all missing, and saying so plainly is better than dressing the row up. Empty fields in a technology index usually mean the fingerprint matched but no metadata was ever attached to the product on our side, and a reader deserves to know which of the numbers in front of them rest on collected data and which rest on nothing.

The number we publish as of November 2026 is 1. A count sitting at the bottom of the index is not automatically a sign of an unimportant product, because a fingerprint that only fires on public pages misses everything running behind a login, and any tool that lives inside an authenticated application spends most of its life out of a crawler's reach. Our count is a lower bound with an unknown gap above it, and pretending otherwise would make the number less useful rather than more.

Where a list like this earns its place is verification. A researcher who suspects a set of companies uses the product can check them one by one and learn only whether the guesses were right. Reading the index from the technology side returns the domains nobody guessed, which is the harder half of the work, and a stored copy of the list can be set against a later one to see which sites picked the code up and which quietly dropped it.