.nf domains list

What is .nf TLD

.nf is the country‑code top‑level domain (ccTLD) assigned to Norfolk Island under the ISO 3166 code “NF.” It designates namespace for registrants connected to the territory while remaining accessible globally subject to registry policy. In our index, .nf domains form a compact but visible corpus, and .nf websites present a small web footprint compared with generic TLDs. Contextually, usage clusters around local institutions, travel, and small businesses, with occasional brand or acronym matches. From an intelligence perspective, the limited size enables clearer mapping of lifecycle events, host infrastructure, and SSL adoption across .nf websites. We also observe comparatively higher exact‑match availability than in saturated spaces. Explore .nf domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .nf TLD

.nf entered the global DNS as a delegated ccTLD in the late 1990s, with stewardship recognized through IANA records and policies shaped by the local registry. Public information indicates a conservative scale: .nf domains number far fewer than mainstream extensions, and .nf websites resolve through a relatively concentrated set of nameservers. Key features typically include second‑level registrations, standard DNS/WHOIS provisioning, and eligibility governed by registry rules; dispute handling generally follows widely used ccTLD frameworks. From our longitudinal datasets, churn rates are low to moderate, parking is present but not dominant, and host geography skews to Oceania and global clouds. These patterns imply predictable stability but limited network effects relative to larger TLDs. Access .nf domain datasets from webatla.

Why and who choose the .nf domain

Organizations with ties to Norfolk Island—public bodies, tourism operators, and local enterprises—are primary adopters, while international projects use .nf domains when the “NF” string aligns with brand initials, communities, or mnemonic naming. For .nf websites, motivations include signaling geographic affiliation, securing short labels still available at the second level, and isolating project namespaces from high‑noise TLDs. We advise weighing recognition and policy fit against benefits such as clearer availability, reduced collision risk, and distinct regional identity. Technical due diligence should assess hosting latency to target audiences, TLS posture, nameserver resilience, and historical reputation of candidate .nf domains. Our cross‑sectional benchmarks support evidence‑based selection and monitoring. Analyze .nf domain datasets from webatla.