.g.se domains list

What is .g.se TLD

The .g.se TLD is a structured third‑level zone under Sweden’s .se country‑code space. In our taxonomy, we analyze it as a discrete namespace to compare behavior across TLD‑like zones and to surface patterns around .g.se domains and .g.se websites. Registrations resolve like conventional hostnames, but policy and eligibility are typically determined by the second‑level operator, not the national registry. At present, we index 6 active .g.se domains, of which 4 are live websites and 4 publish DNS records. Usage spans 2 countries, indicating a limited yet international footprint suited to tightly scoped operations. These baselines support portfolio risk checks, technical due diligence, and competitive monitoring. Download webatla’s .g.se datasets to audit this niche space.

History and key features of .g.se TLD

Historical transparency for third‑level .se zones is limited, so we prioritize observed activity over registry announcements. Over the last week we detected 0 new registrations and 0 in November 2025, reinforcing a steady, low‑churn profile for .g.se domains and .g.se websites. DNS adoption is concentrated: 4 of 6 assets publish records, and 4 host live content, consistent with selective operational use and dormant holdings. Cross‑border presence in 2 countries suggests targeted, not mass‑market, deployment. These traits often correlate with longer retention periods, lower noise, and predictable name‑resolution patterns that inform threat modeling, takedown triage, and asset discovery pipelines. Get the historical .g.se feed from webatla now.

Why and who choose the .g.se domain

Organizations choose .g.se domains for constrained distribution, clear scoping under a recognizable sub‑zone, and alignment with existing Swedish .se footprints while segregating workloads. With 6 active names and 4 observable .g.se websites across 2 countries, the namespace favors focused portfolios over broad marketing campaigns. The recent cadence – 0 last week and 0 in November 2025 – suggests maturity rather than growth, appealing to teams prioritizing stability, discoverability control, and low signal‑to‑noise. Security, brand‑protection, and research groups evaluate such zones to map dependencies, watch for spoofable variants, and rationalize renewals using evidence derived from resolution and hosting telemetry. Download .g.se intelligence from webatla to benchmark opportunity.