.my.id domains list

What is .my.id TLD

The .my.id TLD is a structured second‑level space under Indonesia’s .id country code, where registrants obtain third‑level names (for example, name.my.id). In practice, .my.id domains serve personal, portfolio, and identity‑centric use cases, while remaining accessible to global users through common registrars. From our index, we see .my.id websites spanning multiple languages and hosting geographies, reflecting both local and international audiences. Technically, operation mirrors standard .id policies, with common support for DNSSEC, IPv6, and modern DNS providers via registrars. For search visibility, .my.id can suggest Indonesian relevance, but content quality, links, and performance remain primary drivers. We monitor registration patterns, naming conventions, and lifecycle events to quantify usage trends. Explore our .my.id domain datasets on webatla.

History and key features of .my.id TLD

Introduced by Indonesia’s registry as a personal‑use namespace within the .id hierarchy, .my.id complements other purpose‑specific second‑level labels while focusing on individual identities. Over time, .my.id domains have been distributed through mainstream registrars, following standard EPP transfer flows and widely supporting DNSSEC and modern nameserver configurations. Many registrars offer WHOIS privacy and IDN options where available, enabling multilingual naming for .my.id websites. In our longitudinal crawls, we observe stable renewal behavior, consolidation around a handful of hosting and DNS providers, and gradual uptake of HTTPS by default. These characteristics indicate a maturing space that balances local meaning with global reach. Review webatla’s .my.id datasets for history and features.

Why and who choose the .my.id domain

Individuals, students, creators, and freelancers often select .my.id domains to signal a personal presence with an Indonesian association, while SMEs and community projects use them for lightweight microsites or campaign hubs. Availability tends to be high for name‑based patterns, helping .my.id websites align closely with personal branding. The space is cost‑efficient in many markets, yet still benefits from standard security features and global CDN compatibility. To avoid confusion with Malaysia’s .my, clear on‑page cues and localized content are advisable. We analyze audience geography, naming schema, and infrastructure choices to identify adoption segments and portfolio opportunities across registrars. Benchmark opportunities in webatla’s .my.id domain datasets.