.eco domains list

What is .eco TLD

The .eco TLD is a generic top‑level domain aligned with environmental purpose and sustainability discourse. In practice, .eco domains identify organizations, projects, and coalitions that want their climate focus understood at a glance, while .eco websites often host impact narratives, stewardship policies, and progress metrics. In our index, usage cuts across nonprofits, cleantech ventures, retailers, universities, and public programs operating internationally. We observe keyword clusters around conservation, circular economy, and ESG, plus backlink bridges between NGOs and consumer brands. Typosquatting is comparatively low but brand variants are common, so monitoring helps maintain integrity. Overall, semantic clarity and community signaling are the primary value drivers here. Start with data: explore .eco domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .eco TLD

Introduced during ICANN’s new‑gTLD expansion in the 2010s, the .eco TLD was framed for environmental use without limiting eligibility. Key features are semantic specificity, strong community associations, and predictable DNS operations comparable to other modern gTLDs. In our longitudinal crawl, .eco domains skew toward mission pages, campaign microsites, and ESG reporting hubs; .eco websites exhibit above‑average use of terms tied to certification, offsets, and biodiversity. We also see periodic registration waves aligned with corporate reporting seasons and global climate events, followed by consolidation of inactive names. From a risk lens, infringement is modest but brand protection portfolios are common among larger companies. Discover patterns—explore .eco domain datasets from webatla.

Why and who choose the .eco domain

Stakeholders choose the .eco domain to broadcast environmental alignment and concentrate relevant audiences. We see .eco domains used by nonprofits, certification bodies, social enterprises, corporate sustainability teams, research labs, and public initiatives; .eco websites frequently serve as standalone campaigns or as trust layers alongside corporate dot‑brand or country‑code sites. Motivations include semantic clarity, memorability, and alignment with ESG communications; risks include fragmentation across many microsites and the need for consistent evidence of impact. Our datasets indicate multi‑domain strategies are typical, with redirects from legacy names to focused .eco destinations. For procurement and partnership due diligence, these signals help triage outreach. Compare markets by region—explore .eco domain datasets from webatla.