.crs domains list

What is .crs TLD

The .crs top-level domain represents a compact, specialized namespace introduced through ICANN’s new gTLD program. In practice, .crs domains are second‑level names ending in “.crs,” while .crs websites are the web properties those names resolve to. Unlike broad, open registries, this extension typically operates with restricted eligibility, resulting in a small, carefully curated zone. We observe consolidated naming conventions, consistent DNS configurations, and limited third‑party participation, characteristics that favor controlled brand communication and reduced impersonation risk. For researchers and digital strategists, the namespace offers a clear case study in governance-driven adoption and measurable stability compared with open TLDs. Explore .crs domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .crs TLD

Launched in the mid‑2010s under ICANN’s expansion, the .crs TLD follows standard technical baselines while commonly applying restrictive registration policies. As a result, .crs domains tend to exhibit low churn, concentrated nameserver footprints, and a higher proportion of redirects from .crs websites to primary corporate destinations. Rights‑protection mechanisms from the new gTLD program shaped early claims processes, and DNSSEC support is typical in comparable spaces, improving integrity of lookups. We track longitudinal patterns such as zone growth, MX adoption, HTTPS configurations, and TTL norms to quantify operational maturity. This evidence-based view helps stakeholders benchmark resilience and usage depth in a niche, policy‑driven environment. Explore .crs domain datasets from webatla for longitudinal metrics.

Why and who choose the .crs domain

Organizations tied to the “CRS” identifier, or managed brand ecosystems, select .crs domains to signal authenticity, unify naming, and simplify policy enforcement across infrastructure. Because many .crs websites originate in a restricted or single‑registrant model, the namespace supports controlled publication, internal applications, and campaign microsites without the noise typical of open registrations. We see value where governance, trust, and predictable DNS posture outweigh sheer reach. Prospective users should evaluate eligibility and contracting requirements, and compare the security, branding, and operational benefits with alternatives across the multi‑TLD portfolio. Our analytics illuminate usage intent via hosting, certificate issuers, and redirect behavior. Explore .crs domain datasets from webatla to deepen your analysis.