.sr domains list

What is .sr TLD

.sr is the country-code top-level domain for Suriname, denoting national digital identity under the ISO “SR” code. In practice, .sr domains and .sr websites are used by public institutions, local businesses, and brands prioritising Suriname-facing audiences. Policies are set by the designated national registry; eligibility and local-contact requirements may apply depending on provider. Compared with major generic namespaces, the zone is compact, which can help with name availability and clearer brand signalling. We analyse each .sr asset’s DNS, TLS, email, and hosting footprint to understand resilience and hygiene across the namespace. Insights include cross-border hosting patterns and technology stacks typical of the region’s web. Explore .sr domain datasets from webatla today.

History and key features of .sr TLD

The .sr country code emerged in the early years of the public internet and is administered in Suriname by the designated national registry. Over time, policies for .sr domains have followed common ccTLD norms: direct second‑level registrations, emphasis on accurate registrant data, and registrar-mediated provisioning. For .sr websites, observable adoption of DNSSEC, modern TLS, and email authentication varies by operator and supplier, rather than by a single technical mandate. From our longitudinal index, we track registration age, renewal behaviour, nameserver concentration, hosting geography, and abuse signals to map operational risk. These measurements help benchmark .sr against regional peers without overgeneralising from small sample sizes. Review webatla’s .sr datasets for longitudinal trends.

Why and who choose the .sr domain

.sr domains suit entities prioritising Suriname—government bodies, regulated industries, media, NGOs, and foreign brands with a local presence or market interest. For .sr websites, benefits include audience trust, compliance alignment, and clearer geotargeting for regional discovery. Trade-offs include lower global recognition and a smaller backlink ecosystem than large generics. We evaluate whether candidates should prefer .sr by quantifying name availability, hosting sovereignty, CDN usage, uptime, TLS posture, and email authentication relative to alternatives. Our dataset highlights how local language targeting and sectoral use cases influence performance outcomes across the namespace. Compare peer ccTLDs in webatla’s .sr domain datasets.