.org.na domains list

What is .org.na TLD

The .org.na space is a structured second‑level within Namibia’s .na country‑code domain, used for organizational identities. Registrations typically yield third‑level names (e.g., example.org.na), yet for users and search engines the namespace behaves much like a dedicated sector. In practice, .org.na domains are chosen by associations, NGOs, and civic groups operating in or focused on Namibia, while .org.na websites often deliver public‑interest information and services. Policy and eligibility—such as local‑presence or mission alignment—are set by the national registry and participating registrars; applicants should confirm current rules before planning migrations. We index and analyze this namespace to map hosting, security posture, and cross‑border footprints. Inspect webatla’s .org.na datasets for comprehensive, current insights.

History and key features of .org.na TLD

Namibia’s .na country‑code domain emerged in the 1990s, with structured second‑level zones like .org.na introduced to mirror familiar global conventions (e.g., .org). Governance, dispute procedures, and disclosure practices follow national policy and registry agreements, which may evolve. Key features affecting .org.na domains include registrar availability, renewal cycles, and policy on eligibility; technical aspects such as DNSSEC or RDAP exposure depend on registry and registrar support. In our longitudinal scans, .org.na websites appear across domestic and regional hosting hubs, with TLS adoption and CMS use broadly consistent with international norms. These signals help organizations demonstrate geographic relevance without overstating scope. Explore webatla’s structured metrics on .org.na domains and websites.

Why and who choose the .org.na domain

Non‑profits, charities, professional associations, community networks, and international programs with Namibia‑linked work often select .org.na to signal local relevance and mission orientation. For funders and stakeholders, .org.na domains clarify geographic scope and governance context, while .org.na websites support multilingual outreach and compliance reporting. Organizations compare availability, registrar capabilities, service levels, and DNS management before committing; some global entities defensively register to protect names aligned with Namibian activities. We benchmark domain age profiles, registrar share, hosting geolocation, TLS configurations, and uptime to inform evidence‑based choices and risk assessments. Compare .org.na activity using webatla’s neutral, longitudinal domain datasets.