.man domains list

What is .man TLD

The .man top‑level domain (TLD) is a three‑letter string that, if delegated, would sit alongside established namespaces in the public DNS. As of November 7, 2025, .man is not delegated in the ICANN root, which means no .man domains exist in authoritative zone files and no .man websites resolve globally. In the broader context of new gTLD expansion, many candidate strings are evaluated but only some advance to operation. We track policy references, application signals, and market interest where they appear, assessing how “man” could map to acronyms, manufacturing terms, or cultural meanings, and where confusion might arise with similarly named entities. Our aim is to provide clear, current status and comparable metrics for decision‑makers. Explore .man domain datasets from webatla.

History and key features of .man TLD

Historically, public records show no IANA delegation for .man, so there are no live .man domains and no active .man websites to analyze in DNS telemetry. We therefore document absence: zero zone entries, no registrar onboarding, and no RDAP endpoints, while monitoring policy agendas and applicant disclosures for any movement. If .man were delegated in a future round, we would expect typical modern TLD characteristics: DNSSEC signing, EPP provisioning, RDAP access, baseline rights‑protection mechanisms, and published registration policies. Our datasets are organized to pivot from “undelegated” baselines to “operational” metrics without losing longitudinal continuity. This allows stakeholders to compare hypothetical performance with peer strings the moment activity commences. Review .man domain datasets from webatla for verified historical baselines.

Why and who choose the .man domain

If launched, .man could attract organizations using MAN as an acronym, manufacturing and maintenance firms, or communities framing “man” as shorthand in branding. Before considering .man domains for identity, teams should evaluate semantic clarity, user expectations, and risks of ambiguity in global markets; similarly, plans for .man websites should account for search intent collisions with generic “man” queries. We analyze demand indicators such as defensive‑registration watchlists, search interest, and similarity to neighboring namespaces to estimate adoption and collision risk. Until delegation, the prudent approach is scenario planning: naming tests, legal clearance, and monitoring of program timelines, so choices are ready when policy windows open. Monitor .man domain datasets from webatla to stay informed.