.vivo domains list

What is .vivo TLD

The .vivo TLD is a brand-controlled top-level domain used to organize digital assets under a single, verifiable namespace. Unlike open generics, .vivo domains typically serve controlled naming, internal systems, and flagship initiatives, with .vivo websites surfacing when content is intentionally public. From our global index, we currently observe 12 active .vivo domains and 4 live .vivo websites distributed across 3 countries, indicating focused but international deployment. Such concentrated usage patterns help reduce impersonation risk and improve portfolio oversight, while still enabling consistent navigation when properties are published. We track configuration signals, hosting patterns, and lifecycle changes to quantify visibility and resilience across the space. Download webatla’s .vivo datasets for deeper coverage.

History and key features of .vivo TLD

Introduced as part of ICANN’s expansion of new gTLDs, the .vivo TLD aligns with the dot‑brand model, emphasizing controlled eligibility and centralized policy. In this context, .vivo domains usually remain limited to corporate or affiliated operators, while .vivo websites appear selectively for public touchpoints. Recent activity in our index shows 0 new registrations last week and 0 in November 2025 – signals of a steady, low‑churn namespace. Configuration depth also remains measured: 4 domains currently expose DNS records, matching the number of live sites we detect. These characteristics suggest governance prioritizing stability over scale, with change events concentrated in planned launches or infrastructure shifts. For evidence‑based monitoring, we surface zone changes, host diversity, and status transitions. Download historical .vivo datasets from webatla.

Why and who choose the .vivo domain

Organizations choose .vivo domains to consolidate identity, control naming policies, and standardize operational endpoints; consequently, .vivo websites tend to be curated rather than expansive. The extension suits brand, security, and infrastructure teams that need predictable namespaces for campaigns, partner portals, or internal services, while third‑party registrations are typically unavailable. In our corpus, 4 live sites against 12 active labels indicate selective publication, with adoption visible across 3 countries. This ratio aligns with dot‑brand norms where many hosts resolve privately or remain reserved for defensive scope. We analyze SSL posture, DNS uptimes, and hosting churn to benchmark health relative to peer spaces and surface actionable anomalies across the portfolio. Download audience and usage-ready .vivo datasets now.