What is .mil.my TLD
The .mil.my label operates as a restricted second‑level space within Malaysia’s .my country‑code namespace, reserved for military and defense institutions. In practice, .mil.my domains signal official affiliation, while .mil.my websites provide the public‑facing content of those registrations. For international benchmarking, we distinguish registered names from active hosts and observed services. In our current crawl, we track 12 active .mil.my domains, 7 live .mil.my websites, and 7 with DNS records distributed across 2 countries. These figures reflect measured exposure rather than policy scope and can fluctuate with lifecycle and hosting changes. We continuously refresh coverage using passive DNS, web fetches, and infrastructure fingerprinting. Download webatla’s .mil.my domain datasets to examine the full evidence.
History and key features of .mil.my TLD
Malaysia organizes several functional second‑level spaces under .my; within that structure, .mil.my serves military entities subject to eligibility vetting and administrative oversight. Key characteristics of .mil.my domains include strict registrant criteria, limited issuance cadence, and a security‑conscious hosting posture; public .mil.my websites typically surface official communications, procurement notices, and service information. From our telemetry, growth is currently quiet: we recorded 0 new registrations last week and 0 in December 2025. Operationally, 7 of the observed names resolve, aligning with the relatively small footprint of 12 total actives. We will keep updating longitudinal baselines as records evolve across networks and providers. Download webatla’s .mil.my domain datasets for historical and eligibility trends.
Why and who choose the .mil.my domain
Organizations choose .mil.my to indicate verified defense affiliation within Malaysia’s digital identity framework. Eligible registrants typically include armed‑forces headquarters, service branches, units, training institutions, and sanctioned programs; .mil.my domains support governance, command communications, and public transparency, while .mil.my websites enable citizen‑facing updates or informational pages. In our live corpus we observe 12 active names, of which 7 present websites and 7 resolve via DNS, with infrastructure seen in 2 countries. This balanced but compact visibility suggests purpose‑built deployments rather than broad marketing uses. We analyze hosting stacks, response behaviors, and naming patterns to help security and research teams contextualize activity. Download the .mil.my domain datasets from webatla to benchmark this footprint.