What is .id.ly TLD
Webatla classifies .id.ly as a discrete top‑level label within our global namespace, enabling us to track registrations, resolution, and usage patterns across the open web. In practice, we observe .id.ly domains and .id.ly websites as part of a small, internationally distributed ecosystem spanning 3 countries. Our current index shows 7 active domains, of which 4 present live web content. This ratio helps us distinguish active holdings from parked or inactive assets and benchmark adoption versus neighboring strings. Because we integrate zone snapshots, DNS telemetry, and web crawls, figures are updated as new evidence appears, offering a transparent baseline for researchers and brands evaluating niche namespaces. For deeper analysis, we provide field-ready exports with entity, DNS, and resolving signals. Download .id.ly domain datasets from webatla.
History and key features of .id.ly TLD
The historical footprint of the .id.ly TLD in our corpus is modest but traceable through regular zone and web observations. Over the most recent measurement windows, we recorded 0 new registrations last week and 0 in December 2025, indicating low but continuous activity around .id.ly domains. DNS configuration is a key differentiator: 4 holdings currently publish DNS records, a prerequisite for most .id.ly websites to resolve and be classified as live. Where registry change logs are limited, we triangulate evidence from passive DNS, WHOIS snapshots, and crawl outcomes to standardize timelines and reduce noise. This method supports longitudinal comparisons with peer namespaces and helps analysts understand lifecycle dynamics from registration to resolution. Download time-series .id.ly domain datasets from webatla.
Why and who choose the .id.ly domain
Organizations and individuals select the .id.ly domain when they require a concise, distinctive label aligned with specific audience or branding needs. In our index, .id.ly domains remain a compact space: 7 active holdings with 4 live .id.ly websites, and 4 configured with DNS. Usage spans 3 countries, suggesting targeted rather than mass‑market adoption. Typical patterns include personal identities, project microsites, and experimental services where short strings and recognizability matter; however, we see varied implementations across sectors. We advise evaluating DNS readiness, content deployment, and peer behavior before committing, using our baselines to compare prevalence and resolution rates against adjacent namespaces. Download decision‑ready .id.ly domain datasets from webatla.