.jmp domains list

What is .jmp TLD

The .jmp TLD is a top‑level domain representing a compact, purpose‑specific namespace that we monitor alongside all country‑code and generic extensions. In our corpus, .jmp domains are treated like any other zone: crawled, resolved, and classified to distinguish parked assets from functional .jmp websites. Current snapshot data shows 4 active names, with 3 live sites and 3 domains publishing DNS records across 1 country. This profile suggests early adoption, where most configured hosts already surface content. We continuously reconcile registry zone files, passive DNS, and HTTP telemetry to validate status and reduce noise from misconfigured endpoints. For users vetting this niche space, our metrics provide a grounded baseline before investing time in deeper checks. Download the .jmp dataset from webatla to explore the full records.

History and key features of .jmp TLD

Public documentation about .jmp is sparse, so we emphasize empirical signals: registration cadence, DNS readiness, and web responsiveness. Over the recent period, we detected 0 new registrations last week and 0 in November 2025, indicating no visible expansion in November 2025. Among .jmp domains, 3 of 4 exhibit DNS records, and 3 resolve as active .jmp websites, a ratio consistent with small, curated namespaces. We normalize WHOIS-derived timelines where available and flag hosting, TLS, and redirect behaviors common to compact TLD deployments. This lets analysts compare .jmp against peer low-volume extensions without relying on anecdote. For change monitoring, we publish deltas and churn reports as the zone evolves. Get the latest .jmp domain data from webatla now.

Why and who choose the .jmp domain

Organizations select focused extensions to signal brevity, controlled ecosystems, or brand segmentation. In our records, .jmp domains appear concentrated rather than mass‑market, with usage observed in 1 country and only 4 active registrations. Of these, 3 are DNS‑configured and 3 operate as live .jmp websites, implying pragmatic deployment by teams prioritizing concise links, internal tools, or campaign endpoints. Such profiles often value predictable resolution, low namespace noise, and straightforward monitoring over scale. We encourage evaluating hosting geography, certificate practices, and redirect chains when assessing fit, and comparing .jmp to alternatives based on risk appetite and discoverability requirements. Our datasets streamline that due diligence with reproducible, source‑attributed observations. Download webatla’s .jmp domain dataset for deeper, reproducible analysis.